At the online site of abcnews.com  I read a story on a journalist that was assulted by a comedian. I will critique this on making the important interesting.

This four paragraph, what they call, reporting on this story is insulting, this journalist failed to even mention the full names of those involved. This journalist covered something important, but didn't make it interesting. Instead he gave a poor outline of the story rather than a full interesting report of something that could have been better; it was just like he/she was wanting some other journalist to cover the story. This story is important to the journalist in the area of the crine and to any journalist that has the potential to be put in that situation; I assume that they would want to know when they are under conviction. This problem could have been solved if the journalist maybe tried to produce a report on something up to calabar with other stories under the Washington Post. If you are even remotely interested in this story, don't look here because you will not get it.